The Paradox Of Choice
How does giving your consumers more options influence the purchase outcome?
There is an interesting amount of research around choices being presented to consumers and the effect that this has on their purchase decisions.
Consumers have a choice, but there are so many options that it becomes difficult to decide. When there are too many decisions, consumers become overloaded and paralyzed, and in the end, these same consumers do not make a choice at all.
One study conducted by Iyengar & Lepper (2000) details the effects of more choices presented to consumers versus less choices. The results can be seen in the image below.

This study shows that when consumers are presented with more choices, they are more likely to abandon the purchase.
However, an alternate study conducted by Maxwell (2005) demonstrates that this effect is reduced dramatically when the price of the products are lower.
Thus, depending on the price point, the number of options you present to consumers may differ.
Patagonia & Hyper-Choice
Patagonia, interestingly enough, has a vast array of choices available for consumers. By better categorising their products and reducing the choices available to consumers, Patagonia has the opportunity to increase their profits and reduce the number of consumers abandoning the checkout process.
This can be tested by Patagonia first, before actually putting it out into the market. This sort of consumer research and testing can have an enormous impact on the company. However in saying this, their products are cheap, so as demonstrated in the study by Maxwell (2005), the negative effect of having a large amount of choices is most likely mitigated due to Patagonia’s low price points.
As can see in the images below, having a high number of choices is done both at the product level and the categorisation of products level. The reason Patagonia most likely do this and don’t need to worry is because their brand is trusted and well-known in their target market, they know what their market wants, and they have a low price point, so having a large number of choices most likely doesn’t negatively influence their sales. This contrasts to how they first started off, selling only one category of products.


How Patagonia Reduces Perceived Risk
Essentially, perceived risk is the uncertainty that consumers face when they cannot foresee the consequences of their purchase decisions (Mitchell, 1999).
There are a number of categories of risks associated with perceived risks, including:
- Functional risk – product will not work as well as expected
- Physical risk – product may not be safe
- Financial risk – product will not be worth its cost
- Social risk – possible social embarrassment as a result of the purchase
- Psychological risk – risk a poor product choice will impact on consumer’s self esteem
- Time risk – amount of time spent in product search will be waste if the product does not perform as expected.
Consumers generally attempt to handle risk by seeking information and reassurance. As a marketer, you can leverage this point and influence consumers by lowering their perceived risk. There are also a number of other things you can utilise as a marketer to reduce the perceived risk of a product or service, including: direct marketing, promotional strategies, pricing, branding, channels utilised and target markets, among others.
Perceived risk helps explain why consumers often do not move from the desire stage to the action stage in the customer journey.
(Tian-Que, 2012)
Generally, businesses will find it easy to make sales from referrals, because the trust level of the consumer is higher. However, in order to reach any higher level of growth, businesses need to make sales from traffic sources that are not referrals. The problem is, users from these traffic sources are generally unlikely to buy as scepticism is high and trust is low. What if I buy a product and then it’s not what I was expecting? Won’t I then I lose my money?
So the question is, how can businesses reduce perceived risks for traffic arising from sources other than referrals?
How Patagonia Reduces Consumer Perceived Risks
Patagonia needed to reduce consumer perceived risks in order to generate the millions of dollars that they now create. One way in which Patagonia does this is through providing a return policy.
This policy promises that “if you are not satisfied with one of our products at the time you receive it, or if one of our products does not perform to your satisfaction, return it to the store you bought it from or to Patagonia for a repair, replacement or refund”. It also offers a fair return option via shipping.
Patagonia Return Policy
Another thing that Patagonia includes to reduce consumer perceived risk is through reviews.

By including reviews for products, consumers who don’t yet trust the brand can be sure that the products are as advertised. This effort is also applied through Seller’s Ratings on their Google Ads, which are essentially ratings provided by Google based on reviews. This can be seen below.

Overall, by applying these methods, Patagonia successfully reduces consumer perceived risk.
How Patagonia Uses Disrupt & Intercept Strategies
Brands can be placed into different categories, or sets which define how consumers view or perceive the brand. These include:
- Evoked Set: brands that consumers consider as acceptable to purchase from.
- Inept Set: brands that a consumer excludes from purchase consideration, for whatever reason.
- Inert Set: brands that a consumer is indifferent toward because they are perceived as having no particular advantage.
Obviously, brands in the evoked set will be generating more sales. So the question is, how can you move from the inert or inept set to the evoked set?
There are three specific strategies that can be used depending on what part of the customer journey the consumer is in. If the consumer is in the awareness stage and is not currently searching (known as habitual decision making), then we can use a disrupt strategy. If the consumer is problem aware and starting to search for a solution (known as limited decision making), we can use an intercept strategy. If consumers are ready to buy and are looking for their best options (known as extended decision making), we can use an acceptance strategy.
An easy-to-understand explanation of evoked, inept, and inert sets.
Brand credibility will have a dramatic impact on what set the brand will be placed in by consumers. Three factors that impact brand credibility are:
- Perceived quality of the brand
- Perceived risk associated with the brand
- Information costs saved with that brand (due to time saved by not shopping around)
Playing around with these three factors can help improve brand credibility and thus move your brand closer toward the evoked set.
Patagonia & The Disrupt Strategy
Patagonia used a disrupt strategy to not only “disrupt” the market and get consumers to pay attention to them and actually consider buying their products, but also, they used the strategy in a way which would improve their brand credibility, which as I said is a factor influencing what set the brand will be in (their strategy also acted as an acceptance strategy).
In particular, Patagonia’s “Don’t Buy This Jacket” advertisement was used as a disruption strategy. The advertisement spoke about the cost to the environment of one of their best-selling fleece sweaters and asked consumers to reconsider before buying the product and instead opt for a used Patagonia product. As a result, the company saw a 30% increase in their revenues. While this single advertisement was not necessarily the single cause of this vast increase, it definitely played a part.
This clearly demonstrates how disrupting the market and improving brand credibility can slowly move you into the evoked set, and I think this ad played a big part in giving Patagonia the sort of credibility they were after. This leads into my next point…
Patagonia & Successful Consumer Research
Understanding and predicting consumer behaviour is an essential part of succeeding in business. However, how can you make sure that you can successfully predict this? The answer is, through consumer research. Without consumer research, your business will fail.
Consumer research involves investigating people (consumers) and their environment, and how that make buying decisions. By finding out everything you possibly can about your customer, you can better direct your marketing efforts to influence their behaviour in a way which is favourable to you.
The Questions Consumer Research Helps Answer
There are many questions in business, such as:
- What are consumers in my target market buying?
- When are they buying it?
- Where are they buying it?
- How often are they buying it?
- How often are they using it?
- Are they coming back for a second purchase?
- Why are they buying it?
- Why are sales falling?
Consumer research helps us understand the why questions.
“These sorts of consumers like the idea of buying a product that is made by an environmentally friendly company in an environmentally friendly manner.”
Poonkulah Thangavelu
Patagonia started off as a clothing and gear brand for extreme sports, like climbing. Patagonia’s customer research has enabled them to better understand their target market consumers. Patagonia has discovered that their target market are people who happen to be environmentally friendly. Using this information, Patagonia has had massive success.
One example of this is with their “Don’t Buy This Jacket” advertisement as mentioned previously. On top of this, they made changes in some of their branding, including their environmentally friendly messages on their website and other marketing channels.
As you can see, conducting consumer research can really be a make-it-or-break-it factor in succeeding in business.
Perceived Benefits
Consumers may get x, y, and z benefit from a product, however, they may only perceive that they are getting x benefit from a product. It is important for a marketer to be able to look at the beliefs the consumer has in relation to the benefits they will receive from a product, and what specific factors can influence this perception.
A good example of perceived benefits in action can be seen when looking at Patagonia, the somewhat environmentally-friendly clothing company. Patagonia associates itself with a social cause – that is, making the earth a healthier place to live. By doing this, Patagonia have successfully created an added perceived benefit in the mind of the consumer. This benefit is a social one, related to being associated with a brand that supports the health of the environment. All of a sudden, Patagonia has enabled their target market to move from seeing x benefit to x and y benefit.


